Yes, modern thinking never been able to offer any morality, however the reason is not that it is pure speculation, quite the contrary -- from the very beginning, in all its thicker it is primarily a certain way of doing it. Let someone want rants, prompting the thought out of his hiding place and to declare his choice; let him who wants is trying to build morale without a promise and without virtue. For modern thinking morality is impossible, because since the nineteenth century, the idea have already left for limits itself in its own being, is not more than just a theory; when she thinks she hurt or reconciles, brings us together or splits, it breaks, divides, it connects and reunites, it is not liberate and not enslave. Before you prescribe and prednachertany future, before to predict, what should you do before calling or just be alerted, the idea and its existence, ranging from the the earliest forms, is action, and action is dangerous. De Sade, Nietzsche, Artaud and Bataille knew it for himself and for those who prefer would not see all this; but I knew about it also, Hegel, Marx, Freud. Perhaps you do not notice this, only those who are in deepest folly argues that philosophy without political choice impossible that all thought is either 'progressive' or "reactionary". Their folly -- in the assumption that every thought "expresses the" class ideology; and unwitting of their depth-in fact, they directly point to the current method being ????????2. At first glance it seems that the cognition of the person unlike the Sciences of nature always, even vaguely, related to ethics and politics; however, in the depths of his modern thought rushes in the other direction -- where Else in the man he should be Identical.
Yes, modern thinking
ReplyDeletenever been able to offer any morality, however
the reason is not that it is pure speculation,
quite the contrary -- from the very beginning, in all its thicker it
is primarily a certain way of doing it. Let someone
want rants, prompting the thought out of his hiding place and
to declare his choice; let him who wants is trying to build morale
without a promise and without virtue. For modern thinking
morality is impossible, because since the nineteenth century, the idea have already left for
limits itself in its own being, is not
more than just a theory; when she thinks she hurt or reconciles,
brings us together or splits, it breaks, divides, it connects
and reunites, it is not liberate and not enslave.
Before you prescribe and prednachertany future, before
to predict, what should you do before calling or just
be alerted, the idea and its existence, ranging from the
the earliest forms, is action, and action is dangerous. De Sade,
Nietzsche, Artaud and Bataille knew it for himself and for those who prefer
would not see all this; but I knew about it also, Hegel, Marx,
Freud. Perhaps you do not notice this, only those who are in deepest
folly argues that philosophy without political choice
impossible that all thought is either 'progressive' or
"reactionary". Their folly -- in the assumption that every thought
"expresses the" class ideology; and unwitting of their depth-in fact,
they directly point to the current method
being ????????2. At first glance it seems that the cognition of the person
unlike the Sciences of nature always, even vaguely, related to
ethics and politics; however, in the depths of his modern thought
rushes in the other direction -- where Else in the man
he should be Identical.