Poetic language-the constant object of attention of O. E. Mandelstam. In "Notes on poetry" (1923), he says: "Poetic it gives life to wandering mnogoopytny root. The multiplier of the root-consonant sound-an indicator of its vitality. The word propagated not transparent, and consonants. Agree-the seed and the pledge of the offspring of language. Low linguistic consciousness -- the withering away of feelings are consonant" (ibid.P.69). We give some examples of the structure of thinking O. E. Mandelstam. It is very revealing in this regard expressed V. V. Rozanov: "Rozanov's attitude to the Russian literature the most that neither is colloquial. Literature-a social phenomenon, Philology -- the phenomenon of home, office. Literature-a lecture, street; Philology -- University seminaries, family. Yes, the University Seminary, where five students who are familiar with each other, calling each other on name and patronymic, listen to your Professor, and climb out of the window the branches of friends University of the trees of the garden. Philology-it is family, because all the family rests on intonation and on the quotation, in quotation marks. The lazy said the word family has its own color. And the infinite, the unique, pure linguistic verbal nuance is the background of family life. Here why the attraction of Rozanov to domesticity, so powerfully determined the entire way his literary activities, I deduce from philological nature of his soul, which is in relentless pursuit of hard clicked and ludila their words and phrases, thus leaving only the husk. No wonder that Rozanov was unnecessary and barren writer"
ReplyDeletePoetic language-the constant object of attention of O. E.
Mandelstam. In "Notes on poetry" (1923), he says: "Poetic
it gives life to wandering mnogoopytny root. The multiplier of the root-consonant
sound-an indicator of its vitality. The word propagated not transparent, and
consonants. Agree-the seed and the pledge of the offspring of language. Low linguistic
consciousness -- the withering away of feelings are consonant" (ibid.P.69).
We give some examples of the structure of thinking
O. E. Mandelstam. It is very revealing in this regard expressed
V. V. Rozanov: "Rozanov's attitude to the Russian literature the most that neither
is colloquial. Literature-a social phenomenon, Philology --
the phenomenon of home, office. Literature-a lecture, street; Philology --
University seminaries, family. Yes, the University Seminary, where
five students who are familiar with each other, calling each other on
name and patronymic, listen to your Professor, and climb out of the window the branches of friends
University of the trees of the garden. Philology-it is family, because all
the family rests on intonation and on the quotation, in quotation marks. The lazy said
the word family has its own color. And the infinite, the unique, pure
linguistic verbal nuance is the background of family life. Here
why the attraction of Rozanov to domesticity, so powerfully determined the entire way
his literary activities, I deduce from philological nature of his soul,
which is in relentless pursuit of hard clicked and ludila their words and phrases,
thus leaving only the husk. No wonder that Rozanov was unnecessary and
barren writer"