but for this very reason, the real earnings of almost no to rise above the minimum required for the worker in order to dress, have shelter, to feed. And in the end the income of the entrepreneurs will decrease in the same extent will increase land rents and at what wage worker will remain unchanged. He would constantly decreased down to zero, if not for one obstacle: in fact, at some point revenues in the industry would be too low for the recruitment of new workers; for lack of additional earnings labor force will not be able to grow; there is a stagnation of the population; no no need for plowing new land, more or less fertile than the previous ones; ground rent will reach its ceiling and will cease to exert its customary pressure on profits in industry, which will then be able to stabilize. History in the end, will be fixed. The finiteness of human existence will be defined once and for all, that is indefinite period of time. Paradoxically, but it is the historicity introduced Ricardo in savings, allows you to think this stagnation of History. Though it would seem that the classical way of thinking involved to save always open and subject to future changes, but in fact, it was here only about changes in spatial type: painting, which was supposed to be formed wealth during his deployment, sharing and ordering could well increase in size; however, it remained the same picture, even if every element has lost external the relativity of entering into relations with new elements. On the contrary, the accumulation time of population and production, is a continuous story with rarity allows benefits from the beginning of XIX century to think of the impoverishment of History, its growing inertia, her petrification and soon her stony immobility.
but for this very reason, the real earnings of almost no
ReplyDeleteto rise above the minimum required for the worker
in order to dress, have shelter, to feed. And in the end
the income of the entrepreneurs will decrease in the same extent
will increase land rents and at what wage worker
will remain unchanged. He would constantly decreased down to zero,
if not for one obstacle: in fact, at some point
revenues in the industry would be too low for the recruitment of new
workers; for lack of additional earnings labor force
will not be able to grow; there is a stagnation of the population; no
no need for plowing new land, more or less
fertile than the previous ones; ground rent will reach its
ceiling and will cease to exert its customary pressure on profits in
industry, which will then be able to stabilize. History
in the end, will be fixed. The finiteness of human
existence will be defined once and for all, that is
indefinite period of time.
Paradoxically, but it is the historicity introduced
Ricardo in savings, allows you to think this stagnation of History. Though
it would seem that the classical way of thinking involved to save
always open and subject to future changes, but
in fact, it was here only about changes in spatial
type: painting, which was supposed to be formed
wealth during his deployment, sharing and ordering
could well increase in size; however, it remained the
same picture, even if every element has lost external
the relativity of entering into relations with new elements.
On the contrary, the accumulation time of population and production,
is a continuous story with rarity allows benefits from the beginning of XIX
century to think of the impoverishment of History, its growing inertia, her
petrification and soon her stony immobility.